Diana: a Link to Iran Contra and 9/11?
The recent royal wedding and Cannes Festival release of Unlawful Killing has prompted a resurgence of public interest in the “conspiracy theory” that the royal family and British intelligence secretly arranged the car accident responsible for Princess Diana’s death. Mohammed Al Fayed, the billionaire father of Dodi Al Fayed, who was also killed in the, has spent millions of dollars on litigation attempting to prove that the French and British government guilty of a massive cover-up. He’s also a major backer of the new film.
Al Fayed’s case is based in part on statements Diana made to friends about a “black network” that wanted her dead and would set her up to die in a car accident. However it’s supported by numerous inconsistencies in the “official” account of the accident. The most serious is the claim by French police that the limousine driver’s blood alcohol level was three times the normal limit – which is disputed by the bodyguard Rhees-Jones, who survived the accident, as well as family, friends and work colleagues of the driver Henri Paul. The latter describe him as a highly conscientious professional who rarely drank to intoxication and never while on duty. Others include the failure of the French police to seal the crime scene and the extraordinary length of time it took to get medical attention for Diana, who was still conscious immediately after the accident. After taking thirty minutes to get to the scene, the ambulance drivers left her at the side of the road while they extracted other victims from the limousine. It then took the ambulance another hour to drive her four miles to the hospital.
Some researchers strongly suspect Henri Paul’s blood samples were tampered with. Here is a video link demonstrating how someone looks and acts at a blood alcohol level of 1.75 grams per liter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLzYJa8Wv88. The experimental subject was so intoxicated he could hardly walk and someone had to help him put his car in gear. The video also notes that the pathologist noted no smell of alcohol in Henri Paul’s stomach at autopsy.
While there definitely appears to be a cover-up, it has always puzzled me that people blame the Royal Family, without looking at some of Dodi Al Fayed’s unsavory connections through his uncle Adnan Khashoggi. As I wrote in my recent review of Chain of Command (see last blog) Khashoggi is a Saudi arms dealer and businessman with longstanding ties to the CIA and Bush family. His sister Samira married Mohammed Al Fayed and was the mother of Dodi Al Fayed, Diana’s companion at the time of the accident. At one point, Mohammed was also business partners with Khashoggi.
Adnan Khashoggi
A Long History of Unsavory Intelligence Connections
Khashoggi is best known for his role as the middleman responsible for the arms deal in the Iran-Contra affair. This was a complex transaction in which the Reagan administration with (CIA operative and Marine Colonel Oliver North serving as point man) illegally sold weapons to Iran, an enemy nation, to defy Congress in providing continued funding for the CIA-backed Contras (mercenaries) fighting to topple the democratically elected government of Nicaragua.
Khashoggi’s name first surfaces in intelligence archives as a partner with George H.W. Bush in a CIA-front company known as Barrick Gold and later as Barrick Resources International (a company that mysteriously wound up with the bulk of the gold various Nazi war criminals smuggled out of Europe). Khashoggi was also involved in BCCI (the bank used by the CIA to launder drug profits and to finance covert assassinations and other black operations prior to its shutdown by bank regulators in 1991). Moreover he was also closely linked with the off-the-books intelligence network Bush senior set up after Carter removed him as CIA director in 1997, with the help of the Saudi royal family and Saudi chief of intelligence Kamal Adham (this network is described in detail by Russ Baker in Family of Secrets). Following BCCI’s demise, Khashoggi used his own banking operations in Armenia and elsewhere to finance weapons deals and training cells for this off-the-books network, as well as to launder illicit drug profits.
Khashoggi is also linked to the murder of investigative reporter Danny Casolaro, killed in 1993 just as he was about to release more evidence of the direct involvement of high level US officials (including Bush senior) in Iran Contra, BCCI and the theft and misuse of innovative PROMIS personal tracking software. An interesting 2001 post on Disinformation reveals that Mohammed Al Fayed initially believed Casolaro’s murder was linked to Diana’s death but that the CIA stonewalled his efforts to prove it (http://old.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id902/pg1/index.html).
Khashoggi’s Link to 9/11
Khashoggi is linked to 9/11 in several ways. He was part owner with Adham of Oryx, the company that owned and operated Huffman Aviation in Florida, where Mohamed Ata and other members of his crew learned to fly airplanes (Huffman Aviation was also implicated in smuggling illicit drugs from South America). In addition, several of Khashoggi’s banks were also involved in funding terrorist camps and biological/chemical warfare laboratories in Nagorny Karabakh (a semi-autonomous region in Azerbaijan, one of the former Soviet republics).
However most significant was Khashoggi’s indictment in 2002 for a stock scam in which he clearly demonstrated foreknowledge of the giant Wall Street slump that would follow the twin towers collapse in September 2011. The scam involved Genesis Intermedia (GENI), a communications company. Khashoggi and a number of other Irangate figures who owned GENI stock loaned it to brokerage houses in return for cash collateral – leaving the brokerage houses with worthless stocks when share prices collapsed following 9/11.
Blaming the Royal Family
I have always suspected Mohammed Al Fayed knows more than he lets on about the true circumstances of Diana’s death. Perhaps he (rightly?) believes that it’s safer to blame the royal family than the deadly off-the-shelf intelligence network his brother-in-law Adnan Khashoggi belongs to. So for now he promotes an alternative scenario in order to keep the issue alive.
For a more detailed summary of Khashoggi’s financial scams and shadowy intelligence connections – as well as a full list of the dead bodies that litter his past (including Danny Casolaro) – consult Daniel Hopiscker Welcome to Terrorland www.madcowmorningnews.com and Alex Constantine Adnan Khashoggi Linked to 911 Terrorists http://webfairy.org/constantine/index.htm
7 Comments
This entry is filed under Challenging the Corporate Media, Things That Aren't What They Seem and tagged with 911, bcci, danny casolaro, dodi al fayed, iran contra, khashoggi, mohammed al fayed, princess diana, promis software, unlawful killing.
You can also follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Or perhaps you're just looking for the trackback and/or the permalink.


But why would al-fayed / Khashoggi kill their own son / nephew as “collateral damage? or was Dodi the principal target. Maybe they were worried Diana, an arms-trade opponent I daresay, would influence Dodi to blow the lid on the nasty old men’s misdoings? If so, blaming the Royals would be a great “conspiracy theory” diversion. Does al-Fayed have other sons?
I don’t think Khashoggi killed Dodi and Diana. I think some of the nasty people he was connected with did. I have no idea why. I just think it’s a great pity Mohammed abandoned this line of investigation. My point is that blaming the Royals is, like you say, a diversion.
“I’ve gone ahead and bookmarked http://stuartbramhall.aegauthorblogs.com/2011/05/16/diana-a-link-to-iran-contra-and-911-2/ at Digg.com so my friends can see it too. I simply used Diana: a Link to Iran Contra and 9/11? @ The Most Revolutionary Act as the entry title in my Digg.com bookmark, as I figured if it is good enough for you to title your blog post that, then you probably would like to see it bookmarked the same way
I would agree with Dr Stuart Bramhall on her thoughts here. The best way to do away with someone is to make certain there is someone else that the blame can be placed on first. The diversion and the use of news coverage is a large weapon in hiding the facts that lay below the surface. Most people only want a quick answer and they do not scratch below the surface to find what all the other factors may have been.
And knowing that the royals were already unhappy with Dianna only made it easier to pass it off as them. But seriously what would the royals obtain by killing Dianna? Nothing…
Very interesting links and relationships between people of which I didn’t know much about. By pure intuition, before reading this blog post, I was led to believe Diana’s death is linked to 911 in a way that hasn’t yet been mentioned, and so was Kennedy junior’s plane crash but that’s another story.
First the reader needs to be educated about 911 and all the facts known to this day, which in a court law would prove beyond any reasonable doubts that 911 was indeed a false flag terror attack. (for believers of the old world view, please open your mind and get down the rabbit hole, it ‘s right there in plain view just waiting for a curious and open mind !)
Diana’s death is most likely part of what I would call, eliminating people who may get in the way of the 21st century master plan to create this so called 100 years “war on terror” (which is just a front for the appropriation by the West of middle eastern oil energy resources).
If indeed, this has been in the planning for over a decade (many known facts point to this possibility as more than just a possibility), then, people such as Diana would have known of a plot to mastermind a false flag event of the 911 scale. Being who she was, against war and arms trade, and dating a man whose business relationships are linked to the Bush family and their war profiting dealings since WWII, she could have been most influential in turning her man around and learning things she herself wasn’t supposed to know.
Then the chance always existed, that Diana could go public about this Machiavellic plan, before or after the event. Should it have happened before, the plan would have had to be abandoned. Years of covert military planning and financial strategies to profit from this false flag event could not be delayed by another possible whistle blower that Diana potentially was.
Now the question is, was the CIA or the Royal family responsible for her death? They both protect the same oil interests, they were both aware to say the least of the 911 false flag event. The Royal Family basically owns BP-oil and the CIA serves the interest of WallStreet and war profiteers.
Whoever was responsible, it’s hard to believe the Royal Family would order her death, however much the interests of the West and BP oil were at stake. But then again, who knows where these people allegiances may lay when it comes to preserving the foundation of their power structure.
We can speculate about the reason for her assassination, but one thing remains certain, all Western countries are complicit in the sense none wants to investigate her death or 911. The reason for her death would shatter our common worldview (learned in school and hammered in via indoctrination) about this world, and also threaten the very foundation of the power structure on which nations and world organizations are built.
Thank you, JonJon. Your analysis is incisive and highly plausible.
[...] Diana: a Link to Iran Contra and 9/11? @ The Most Revolutionary Act [...]