Smoking Gun: US Role in Arab Spring

Arabesque Americaine
Arabesque American
by Ahmed Bensaada
(Michel Brule May 2011)
In tracking down sources for an upcoming presentation on the antiglobalization movement, I have come across a little gem called Arabesque Americaine by French Canadian author Ahmed Bensaada. The full title is Arabesque Americaine: Le role des Etats-Unis dans les revoltes de la rue arabe — translated American Arabesque: the Role of the US in the Revolts in the Arab Streets.
I have been increasingly skeptical of the authenticity of the “Arab Spring” revolutions — especially in Egypt (where the outcome is a military junta) and Libya (which, like Iraq , has been bombed back to the Middle Ages). Last February, a few blogs mentioned a 2009 meeting between Hillary Clinton and one of Egypt ‘s (presumably) US funded pro-democracy groups. Then the English alternative media and blogosphere went all quiet on the issue.
Arabesque Americaine leaves absolutely no doubt that the “Arab Spring” — like the earlier “color revolutions” in eastern Europe — were almost certainly destabilization/regime change operations, funded and orchestrated by the CIA, State Department, historic CIA-funded foundations — and last, but not least, Google.
Bensaada’s 120-page book provides a carefully researched and referenced account of each of the foundations that are “exporting democracy” to MENA (the Middle East and North Africa ), along with an exact accounting of the millions of dollars given to each country in 2009 and the specific groups the funds went to.
My favorite chapter was the one describing the role these foundations, the State Department, and Google have played in training young MENA activists in the use of social media (e.g. Facebook and Twitter). I was particularly interested in the free access and training they provide international youth activists on TOR, a special software designed to evade government surveillance (which, under the Patriot Act, is illegal in the US ).
Bensaada, who was born and received his early education in Algeria, devotes special attention to the Egypt revolution, emphasizing the role Google played via their star employee Wael Ghonem.
The following is a brief outline of the topics covered:
Chapter 1 — concerns the secret American funding and orchestration of the so-called “color revolutions” in Eastern Europe , with particular focus on Serbia (2000), Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004) and Kirghizistan(2005). In each case, pro-Soviet governments were overthrown by mobilizing disaffected, pro-Western young people — financed by the CIA, State Department, and Pentagon linked “democracy manipulating” foundations. The latter include National Endowment for Democracy (NED), National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI), Freedom House (FH), the Albert Einstein Institute, the Center for Non Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) — and George Soros’ Open Society Institute (OSI).
Chapter 2 — contains a detailed discussion of the above think tanks and foundations, which includes a description of the their government funding, as well as the subversive activities (espionage, election rigging, an popular destablization activities) they promote in countries like Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba and Iran that oppose America’s pro-corporate agenda.
Chapter 3 — discusses the promotion, by the State Department and these think tanks and foundations, of new technologies in these destabilization campaigns. I was fascinated by Bensaada’s description of Guide Star’s TOR Project, which permits anonymous navigation of the Internet. According to their own website, TOR is funded by Google, the US Naval Research Lab, and Human Rights Watch (HRW). In 2004 Paul Treanor documented that HRW is a joint project of Soros’ Open Society Institute and the State Department (http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/HRW.htm). US Wikileaks spokesperson Jacob Appelbaum, the main TOR spokesperson, travels all over the world training activists in the use of TOR (Wikileaks uses TOR on their servers).
Chapter 3 also discusses the role of Movements.org and the Alliance of Youth Movements in promoting the use of social media to international youth activists (once again, Bensaada points out that promoting protests via social media is illegal in the US — he cites the example of an activist arrested at the 2009 G20 Summit in Pittsburgh). Movements.org is run by Jared Cohen, the director of Google Ideas and a former adviser to both Condolizza Rice and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Jason Libman, another Google employee formerly employed by both the State Department and the Pentagon. AYM executive director David Nassar was formerly employed by NDI, USAID and IRI. The list of luminaries who participated in a 2008 Summit focused on teaching international activists how to use Facebook and Twitter is also extremely enlightening: Sherif Mansour from Freedom House, James Glassman from the State Department, Larry Diamond from NED, and national security advisor Shaarik Zafar.
Chapter 4 — focuses on the specific case of Egypt, with particular attention to the role played by Google employee Gael Ghonem, who was given paid leave from his job (Google’s chief of marketing for MENA) to participated in the Tahrir Square uprising. Ghonem was responsible for creating the Facebook page “We are all Mohamed Bouazizi” after the Tunisian fruit seller trigger the Tunisian revolution by setting himself on fire. Ghonem also created the “We are all Tal Al-Mallou” to pressure Syria to release the Syrian blogger after she was arrested for espionage activities in the Syrian Embassy in Cairo . Back in 2009, he also set up a Facebook page for Egyptian exile Mohammed El-Baradei, in advance of his February 2010 visit to Cairo to explore a bid for the Egyptian presidency. The visit, according to Wikileaks cables, was organized through the US embassy. Please note this was a full year before the Tahrir Square protests.
In this chapter, Bensaada also focuses on two lead organizers in the April 6th movement (Bassam Samir and Adel Mohamed) with strong links to Washington and the “color revolutions.”
Chapter 5 — focuses on the pro-democracy organizations in other Arab countries (Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebannon, Lybia, Morocco, Palestine, Tunisia, Yemen, and Syria) financed by the State Department and the “democracy manipulating” foundations. In his appendix, Bensaada identifies the specific pro-democracy groups by name and the exact amount of US funding each received in 2009.
Chapter 6 — a summation and analysis, which explores the ethical dilemma faced by many Egyptian activists on learning the non-violent materials they were using to organize demonstrations were the creation of CIA and State Department Funded think tanks and Foundations.
Arabesque Americaine is available in print for $16.95 from Amazon Canada (with links to discount distributors selling it for $11.08). It’s also available in Epub from two sites. According to one ebook distributor, Archambault, the Epub version is only available in Canada to “protect the rights” of the author. A second site, Livresquebecois.com allowed me to pay for and download the Epub version. However the file they provided is corrupted and had to be converted to PDF (via free downloadable software) in order to read it.
Bensaada’s writing is unusually clear and concise. Thus I highly recommend the book, even where readers have only limited knowledge of French. More than half the reference links are to English sites. That alone, in my opinion, is more than worth $11.08 for a print copy .
7 Comments
This entry is filed under The Wars in the Middle East, Things That Aren't What They Seem and tagged with albert einstein institute, alliance of youth movements, arab spring, arabesque americaine, bensaada, canvas, color revolutions, egypt, el-baradei, freedom house, google, human rights watch, jacob appelbaum, libya, mena, movements.org, ndi, ned, open society institute, soros, tahrir square, tor, usaid, wael ghonem.
You can also follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Or perhaps you're just looking for the trackback and/or the permalink.

What proof has this author offered?
Emily, here is a partial list of references from Bensaada’s “Arab Spring” (many are in French but can be translated with Google translate):
« L’Égypte demande le gel des avoirs de Moubarak et de sa famille à l’étranger», Le Monde, 21 février 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2011/02/21/l-egypte-demande-le-gel-des-avoirs-de-moubarak-et-de-sa-famille-a-l-etranger_1483326_3218.html#ens_id=1470465&xtor=RSS-3208
« L’Égypte demande le gel d’avoirs d’anciens responsables du régime Moubarak », Le Monde, 15 février 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2011/02/15/l-egypte-demande-le-gel-d-avoirs-d-anciens-responsables-du-regime-moubarak_1480192_3218.html
« Hillary Clinton milite pour la liberté sur Internet », Le Monde, 16 février 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2011/02/16/hillary-clinton-milite-pour-la-liberte-sur-internet_1480855_651865.html
« Google, les États-Unis et l’Égypte », Le Monde, 3 février 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2011/02/03/google-les-etats-unis-et-l-egypte_1474508_651865.html
Ahmed Bensaada, «Téhéran-Gaza : la différence médiatique », Géostratégie, 3 juillet 2009, http://www.geostrategie.com/1724/teheran-gaza-la-difference-mediatique
« Iran : Washington intervient auprès de Twitter », Technaute, 18 juin 2009, http://technaute.cyberpresse.ca/nouvelles/internet/200906/16/01-876173-iran-washington-intervient-aupres-de-twitter.php
Lire, par exemple, John Laughland, «La technique du coup d’État coloré», Réseau Voltaire, 4 janvier 2010, http://www.voltairenet.org/article163449.html
Manon Loizeau, « Les États-Unis à la conquête de l’Est », 2005. Ce documentaire peut être visionné à l’adresse suivante : http://mecanoblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/etats-unis-a-la-conquete-de-lest-video/
Lire, par exemple, Ian Traynor, « US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev», The Guardian, 26 novembre 2004, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/nov/26/ukraine.usa
Shabab 6 April Youth Movement, http://shabab6april.wordpress.com/shabab-6-april-youth-movement-about-us-in-english/
WikiLeaks, câble 10CAIRO99, http://213.251.145.96/cable/2010/01/10CAIRO99.html
WikiLeaks, câble 08CAIRO2371, http://www.wikileaks.ch/cable/2008/11/08CAIRO2371.html
Fanoos Encyclopedia, « Israa Abdel Fattah », http://www.fanoos.com/society/israa_abdel_fattah.html
Michel Chossudovsky, « Le mouvement de protestation en Égypte: Les “dictateurs” ne dictent pas, ils obéissent aux ordres », Mondialisation, 9 février 2011, http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/the-junk-bond-%E2%80%9Cteflon-guy%E2%80%9D-behind-egypt%E2%80%99s-nonviolent-revolution/
Canvasopedia, http://www.canvasopedia.org/
Maidhc O. Cathail, « The Junk Bond “Teflon Guy” Behind Egypt’s Nonviolent Revolution », Dissident Voice, 16 février 2011, http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/the-junk-bond-%E2%80%9Cteflon-guy%E2%80%9D-behind-egypt%E2%80%99s-nonviolent-revolution/
Tony Cartalucci, « CIA Coup-College: Recycled revolutionary “props” », Info War, 20 février 2011, http://www.infowars.com/cia-coup-college-recycled-revolutionary-props/
Thierry Meyssan, « L’Albert Einstein Institution : la non violence version CIA» », Réseau Voltaire, 4 juin 2007, http://www.voltairenet.org/article15870.html
Tina Rosenberg, «Revolution U », Foreign Policy, 18 février 2011, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/02/16/revolution_u?page=0,7
Jeffrey Fleishman, « Young Egyptians mount unusual challenge to Mubarak », Los Angeles Times, 27 janvier 2011, http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/27/world/la-fg-egypt-youth-20110128
Florian Bieber, « The Otpor Connection in Egypt », Balkan Insight, 31 janvier 2011, http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/blog/the-otpor-connection-in-egypt
Shabab 6 avril Youth Movement, « Que faire si vous êtes arrêté », http://shabab6april.wordpress.com/shabab-6-april-youth-movement-about-us-in-english/v
David D. Kirkpatrick et David E. Sanger, « Egyptians and Tunisians Collaborated to Shake Arab History », The New York Times, 13 février 2011,http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/14/world/middleeast/14egypt-tunisia-protests.html
AFP, « Égypte: le PDG de Google “très fier” de ce qu’a accompli Wael Ghonim », 15 février 2011, http://www.france24.com/fr/20110215-egypte-le-pdg-google-tres-fier-qua-accompli-wael-ghonim
International Crisis Group, « Crisis Group Announces New Board Members », 1er juillet 2010, http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/publication-type/media-releases/2010/crisis-group-announces-new-board-members.aspx
Thierry Meyssan, « La nébuleuse de l’ingérence “démocratique” », Réseau Voltaire, 22 janvier 2004, http://www.voltairenet.org/article12196.html
NED, « 2009 Annual report : Egypt », http://www.ned.org/publications/annual-reports/2009-annual-report/middle-east-and-north-africa/description-of-2009-gra-2
Yves Eudes, «Des vidéos vues en direct et stockées à l’abri », Le Monde, 21 février 2011, http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2011/02/21/des-videos-vues-en-direct-et-stockees-a-l-abri_1483057_3212.html
The International Solidarity Movement, « Mohamed Adel a enfin été libéré » », http://www.ism-france.org/temoignages/Mohamed-Adel-a-ENFIN-ete-libere-article-10484
[...] Article by Stuart Bramhall. [...]
[...] the US) sponsored by the State Department and CIA-linked democracy manipulating foundations (see L’Abarabesque Americaine by French-Canadian analyst Ahmed Bensada and Tony Cartalucci’s Soros Celebrates the Fall of [...]
[...] Strategies (CANVAS) in funding and training other “Arab Spring” activists (see Smoking Gun: US Role in Arab Spring, it’s hard to believe the CIA doesn’t have their sticky fingers in Angola’s [...]
[...] Endowment for Democracy (one of several CIA-funded “non-profit” foundations), one which Ahmed Bensaada and others have identified as playing a pivotal role in training the activists who helped launch [...]
[...] He notes that these new divisions “challenge us to avoid the tragedy of the commons at a global level,” making top-down authority virtually impossible to enforce. Recent examples include the Arab Spring uprisings across the Middle East and northern African countries, in which technological tools and networks helped activists organize and protest authoritarian regimes (aided by more-than-generous grants from the U.S. State Department). [...]